Why Twilight Won’t End With Breaking Dawn
(Even Though It Should)
To those of you who found themselves excited regarding next
month’s unharness of The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Half 2 for the only
reason that it finally wraps up the saga of Bella, Edward and Jacob as gifted
to the world by Stephenie Meyer, you'll wish to sit down down for a second; I
actually have some dangerous news. According to reports that appeared on-line
last week, Summit Entertainment is considering continuing the movie series past
the story from the primary novels, with sources suggesting either movies or TV
show spin-offs “simply set in the identical world as the one in the movies,
however not that features the most trio,” with specific attention being paid to
the Native American werewolf pack that seems within the initial. You will begin
your gnashing of teeth currently.
It’s not simply Twilight haters who should feel nervous
concerning this development. The history of cinema is crammed with makes an try
by studios, executives and well-which means-however-misguided moviemakers to
hunt out some method to extend the lifespans of successful film series well
past their time. An entirely unscientific survey of my Twitter feed recently
revealed that the common consensus was that every long-lived series has gone a
minimum of one installment too long; certain enough, once you study this list,
it’s arduous to create an argument otherwise. It’s one in every of these things
that exposes the strain between creative integrity and business acumen in the
planet of recent media—turning regardless of shocked and entertained us in
first blush into commodities to be repeated, repackaged endlessly on an
everyday basis is one factor that we tend to have a tendency to instinctively
recoil from, I think, as a results of we tend to have a tendency to wish our
stories and ourselves to be “higher” than that. We aren't numbers, we have a
tendency to tend to suppose to ourselves, and what we tend to generally tend to
induce pleasure from has one issue “a heap of” to it than pre-packaged
ingredients mixed in a very terribly explicit formula, right…?
Worse still, the Twilight potential spin-offs or sequels
could build the most important mistake of all—continuing on without the central
characters. You will observe a variety of the better-known samples of this
trend and judge for yourself whether or not or not or not it’s a sensible idea,
however it does counsel that a express movie series has stopped being
concerning consistent characterization and a coherent narrative in favor of
“further of the identical, but less thus.” An stunning, however not
unconvincing, example: Examine what happened to the American Pie series as a
result of it continued sans the initial cast. Or the planet of the Apes series,
in that two separate astronauts — further, if you embrace the television
spin-off — had specifically the identical freak accident that threw them into
an ape-dominated therefore much future, as a result of Charlton Heston knew to
quit once his first movie.
(ADDITIONAL: The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn-Half I. A heap
of Like Breaking Yawn)
These days, after all, we have a tendency to expect movie
audiences to be additional evolved, with tastes therefore refined that such
casual ingenious sleight-of-hand would be rejected outright. That’s why we have
reboots, when all; same end results of cheaper, younger casts, however without
the need to lose the cozy familiarity of the central characters that everyone
knows and loves. Everybody wins, so long as you don’t count the initial forged.
However, as this year’s The Bourne Legacy ably demonstrated, the idea of
replacing your big names with newcomers playing the younger brother/distant
relative/employee of your favorite character lives on, with Bourne performing
surprisingly strongly at the box workplace for a sequel devoid of the leads of
the sooner installments. Take into consideration it either a solitary throwback
to the days where the Apes movies were successful no matter who the humans in
question were, or a form of things to come; once all, 2014?s Transformers four
is additionally reported to be moving down the same “actors and characters are
interchangible, it’s all regarding the toys” route. (It’s a neater pill to
swallow on tv, it appears: Contemplate the success of one factor like Frasier
as a continuation of Cheers, or Lou Grant as the following chapter of The Mary
Tyler Moore Show.)
I’m tempted to push Marvel Studios’ mooted SHIELD TV show in
with this trend of dumping your heroes for his or her newer counterparts. Yes,
it’s not a right away replacement for the Avengers movies, however it's a
spinning out of one background concept in an attempt to stay the hunger for the
initial, therefore abundant totally totally different, concept satiated. Is
that really so completely different from following The Twilight Saga with The
Saga of those Werewolves That Don’t Like Shirts Out’ve Twilight?
In fact, SHIELD has one issue going for it that any
potential The Twilight Saga: Those Other Guys movie would: the active
participation of Joss Whedon, the writer and director of The Avengers, the
movie that got everybody curious about SHIELD in the first place. As unclear as
the longer term of a future Twilight project is, not one report has instructed
that Stephenie Meyer is concerned in any wise capability, and she or he’s
actually remained mum on the topic since the rumors broke. Sources are, of
course, saying that any continuation would solely happen along with her
“blessing,” a splendidly imprecise concept that enables her to stay out of the
fray should the new comes flop, but claim credit should they succeed, and each
one while not much direct involvement in the least. The importance of Meyer’s
commitment to the long term of the Twilight franchise, but, points towards
something that Summit ought to be taking very seriously because it considers
whether or not or not to travel forward with any post-Breaking Dawn comes for The
Twilight Saga: how best to handle the fan base.
Additional than any historical suckiness of recent solid
sequels and additional than the priority concerning accidentally overstepping
the mark and making one Twilight too several, the most important danger for
further Twilight comes is alienating the franchise’s core audience. Once all,
the “Twihard” relationship with Twilight is something notably intense. Fans
hold the novels up as the central texts so much additional than the movies and
are so a ton of likely to be suspicious of something that steps outside of the
boundaries and relationships created within the books, perhaps deeming them
either superfluous or, worse, blasphemous.
(ADDITIONAL: Get Back: Prometheus, Before Watchmen and
conjointly the Complicated Art of the Prequel)
The best parallel to the current is that the reaction to DC
Comics’ announcement of Before Watchmen, a multi-series prequel to Alan Moore
and Dave Gibbons’ groundbreaking Watchmen comic that featured no inventive
input from either Moore or Gibbons. DC was attacked for “turning [the original]
into bland, infinitely reproducible genre product”, with the project described
as heresy while the creators accountable were described as “rancid scabs” for
operating on the project. (Despite this anger, the comics still sell well, with
the first issues released breaking into the prime 10 for that exact month.)
While I doubt that any Twilight follow-up would lead to quite as vitriolic a
response, there’s no obtaining round the terribly fact that, when you've got
interaction an acquaintance base as passionate as that of Watchmen or Twilight,
you’re taking part in with fireside. As simply as the audience will embrace you
for doing one thing that they approve of, they can flip on you for doing one
issue deemed unacceptable, with the road between the 2 not entirely clear to
“outsiders.”
And any future Twilight project risks the wrath of the
Twihard devoted in an exceedingly truthful additional obvious method: it won’t
actually be Twilight. As countless people have argued, the attractiveness of
The Twilight Saga isn’t the thought of sparkly vampires or shirtless werewolves
co-existing at intervals the Pacific Northwest where they'll brood and smolder
at each completely different, but the central relationship between Bella and
Edward (a love that cannot speak its name and goes against societal norms, but
nonetheless makes every characters into extra complete, higher individuals; a
relationship in that the feminine is place on a pedestal whereas taking a
lively, nurturing role within the link to “heal” the more aggressive aspect of
the male). Once you are trying to inform a story among the Twilight world that
isn’t concerning Bella and Edward, you immediately lose that draw for readers
and, worse, risk undermining the book’s not-too-refined positioning of the
attempt’s relationship as every the Greatest Love of All and additionally the
Center of the Universe. Making an attempt to recreate the Bella/Edward dynamic
with new characters may build sense from a “provide them what they wish”
approach, however doing therefore might all too merely diminish the adolescent
self-importance that’s essential to Stephenie Meyer’s original story. When
you're taking Bella and Edward out of Twilight, all you’re left with may be a
reasonably generic vampire and werewolf story.
Cinematic history has demonstrated that removing your main
characters from a movie series sometimes ends up in lesser — and fewer
successful — results. The thought of a sixth installment of a series that
choices an all-new solid in an exceedingly story so much from the central arc
of the first five movies would seem to be a probably troubling risk. Add to
that the opportunity for upsetting fans by going beyond the core text of the
first novel series for the primary time, raising the potential to be seen as
“exploiting” the property and its fan base rather than just faithfully hewing
to the earth that Stephenie Meyer created, and the complete notion begins to
feel less sort of a dangerous set up and additional kind of a suicide mission.
That doesn’t rule out the likelihood of it really happening,
of course; a world in that we tend to’re seeing trailers for a fifth Die
Exhausting movie is one that ably demonstrates the triumph of potential box
office earnings over creative sensibilities. But to work out Summit stretch The
Twilight Saga past its supposed endpoint is to observe the studio risk its
crown jewel for the promise of slightly further profit. If they plan to travel
ahead with the rumored plans, those vampires can sparkle just a little less
brightly.
Robert Pattinson: 'The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 2' Sex Scene Is "Ridiculous"
Calling all Twihards: if you simply
will’t wait till the midnight release of The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part
two on Nov. sixteen, have we have a tendency to got a treat for you. Check out
the simply released “Final Chapter” two-minute featurette on the finale below.
This extended preview includes scenes and pictures within
the highly anticipated flick, plus exclusive interviews with director Bill
Condon and stars Kristen Stewart, Robert Pattinson, Ashley Greene, and Taylor
Lautner.
One thing you won’t find the celebrities talking about within
the featurette? The sex scene between new-vampire Bella and her husband Edward.
Don’t you worry, Pattinson dished on the “ridiculous” sex scene in an interview
on the Australian speak show Kyle and Jackie O.
"The sex scene during this one is pretty ridiculous,"
Pattinson said. "It's just as a result of you're reasonably shooting stuff
to be PG-13. It's simply that you’re making an attempt to think of creative
ways in which to form one thing attractive. It cannot just be a traditional sex
scene. It's alleged to be regarding like the greatest vampire sex you have ever
had. A lot of it absolutely was just shut ups on me and Kristen’s faces."
New 'Breaking Dawn: Part 2' Featurette Is the Best Sneak Peek So Far (VIDEO)
The days leading up to the release of Breaking Dawn: Part a
pair of are dwindling, and meaning Summit Entertainment is ramping up promos
for the highly anticipated flick like whoa. Because, you recognize, apparently
a dramatic Hollywood cheating scandal involving the leading lady and her man is
not enough to whet Twi-hards' appetites for the ultimate chapter of the
Twilight saga. We have a tendency to want MORE!
Well, a whole new featurette has hit the Official Twilight
YouTube channel, and it's got sneak peeks of the flick and additional insider
scoop from Kristen Stewart, Robert Pattinson, Taylor Lautner, Mackenzie Foy who
plays Renesmee, and director Bill Condon. It offers up new "meat" to
whet fans' appetites whereas giving newbies who aren't nevertheless clued in on
the films a brief synopsis of what they'll expect. Check it out ...
Exciiiiiiting!!! I love how Condon says, "You’ve been
watching four movies where you see vampires from the outside and currently
you're able to expertise what it’s like to work out the world visually as a
vampire may." I didn't notice that the film would be shot with that
perspective, however it makes sense, being that Bella is currently a vampire.
Also, as several clips of Bella being a vampire as there are
in the trailers we have seen so so much, it's still awesome to work out her
jumping off of cliffs and flying through the air. And oh yeah, enjoying horny
undead romance together with her undead husband! I'm actually digging all of
that a lot of than the extreme preview of the climatic battle scene between the
Cullens and also the Volturi. But of course, that appears pretty wild, too.
All in all, the featurette has me convinced the final
chapter of the Twilight saga is going to be a should-see -- for fans and
therefore the however-uninitiated alike.
Post source internet….
The Filmmakers Respond: Is ‘Cloud Atlas’ Too Difficult For General Audiences?
When Cloud Atlas opens this Friday, it’s going to be terribly divisive. Some, like myself, will be transfixed by the way the film takes you on a journey across time, enlightening the audience to the evolution and connections of the human soul via multiple genres, tones and additional. Others would possibly notice it confusing, overly long and distracting. Directors Andy Wachowski, Lana Wachowski and Tom Tykwer are awake to this and, in the third part of my interview with the co-writers and administrators of this unbelievable film, they discuss those difficulties and how they were an obstacle from the very starting of the process.
/Film: When we initial heard about Cloud Atlas it absolutely was an issue mark of “How are they going to adapt this?” Then we tend to saw that first trailer and people said, “holy shit.” Then a couple of competition screenings and you have an Oscar contender. That’s what it looks like. My question is…
[Lana knocks on the wood table.]
General audiences don’t appear to be as receptive as the film fan audience. This could be a difficult film. If the movie will not connect with general audiences, are you guys going to be okay with that?
Lana Wachowski: That’s forever a onerous queryto start with a negative.
I want it to connect, I worded that poorly…
Tom Tykwer: What we were really thinking and what we tend to feel is, you recognize whether or not it succeeds or not, we after all don’t understand, but we have a tendency to know there’s a large amount of people out there who are desperately hungry for films that do deliver giant scale, sensible, complicated, very fashionable filmmaking and that aren't putting themselves during this restrictive category of “I am just an action guy and I actually have to possess these characters that are continually in those actioners” or “I’m just a terribly romantic movie with terribly sweet folks,” but saying the mix and the size of films…
If you are feeling like a movie is prepared for the large screen today, it looks prefer it additional or less has to own a superhero in involved or it has to own a very restricted framing of genre and we don’t assume that’s what people wish. We extremely think individuals get exhausted regarding it and i’m not even saying that some of those moves aren’t fun, you know, we have a tendency to watch them. It’s obvious that we have a tendency to are not against this, as a result of we grew up in it. We have a tendency to are popular culture youngsters terribly a lot of, but we grew up in a time where it had been continually there was a selection to it, there was terribly pop cultural iconic and generally simplified, but joyful experiences next to films like David Lean’s films or Stanley Kubrick’s films, which were also a giant scale and also demanding and adult oriented. We have a tendency to feel it may become a dying species and we don’t believe it’s true that it’s dying, as a result of individuals aren’t there to observe it. I suppose they're simply not being invited enough anymore.
I hope therefore. I love the movie, so I didn’t mean to be negative, however that’s simply…
Lana Wachowski: We have a tendency to recognize it’s a dark horse. If it had been a clear cash proposition that Warner Brothers would have financed it in an exceedingly second. They're an extremely conservative company and we tend to have made them, allow us to say, a important amount of money. If all alternative filmmakers were as profitable as we are, they would in all probability be a very little a lot of risky with how they let their filmmakers go, however we tend to knew it was risky. It absolutely was vital to us.
I mean it has no monetary logic for us. We put our fees into it. We place our own cash into it, because it had been thus important to us. At the end of the day, the very fact that it’s created is in itself incredibly satisfying and a kind of gift. The making of the movie was one amongst the foremost stunning, extraordinary, incredible… It was one among the toughest things we’ve ever done, but it had been thus astonishing from working with Tom to operating with these actors, and each one had this spirit of affection and love of art and love of cinema and attempting to try and do one thing that hadn’t been done. That was like in each department. I mean even the caterer was excited by the movie. I mean extremely it absolutely was joyful and at the end we have a tendency to watched it the primary time with David Mitchell, that was very vital to us that David liked it and he watched it and he had tears. He said, “It’s magnificent.” At that point… Well it had been extremely important that Tom Hanks liked it too. We have a tendency to were dying for him to love it, but when both of these 2 people were moved by it and felt the means we tend to did about it, that was a kind of success that in some ways in which was a lot of important to us than any financial success.
Tom Tykwer: And the money half of it, that also is quite ironic and kind of beautiful in a method in that although it was thus arduous, the movie only became potential because of a mess of folks joining forces. It wasn’t like one big investor saying “I wish studio saying.” It would are easier for us, in fact, and it made it much more durable, however in a very method it quite fits into the scheme of the entire making of it that there have been thus many countries and continents and people and people on the entire planet that we had to approach, convince them till they got convinced, and really took quite a considerable risk.
Lana Wachowski: It absolutely was their courage.
Tom Tykwer: They had the courage. They had the belief that “This may be value it.” Now they're believers. The film world is so targeted on the domestic American market and we have a tendency to all understand it’s not what the fact is anymore.
Andy Wachowski: A movie will’t be outlined by what it will in the box office, whether it’s successful or not.
Lana Wachowski: Especially now not by the box workplace of America.
Tom Tykwer: Yeah, that’s what I mean. I mean we tend to don’t know. Some films slide off and say they merely do twenty % of what they do in the world in America and we have a tendency to don’t understand what this can be, as a result of we grasp that… I will sense for instance…. As a result of Germany was a significant investor in the film, I can sense currently once I’m home, there’s extremely a ton of vibe about this movie. I cannot imagine that there won’t be a minimum of some substantial embrace of it. I don’t know how a lot of it can be to be commercial, however there can be a heap of presences with it and therefore what we need is individuals to just…
Lana Wachowski: It took the courage of this multitude of drops to truly make the movie which all of them care so a lot of, simply like in the same means that the individuals who were creating it cared, the financiers were emotionally invested within the story, and at the top… You have got this kind of energy that’s within the structure of the story itself, that these multitude of drops are clinging along because of an act of courage, this issue has been created. This piece of art has been created. In the same means you sit here as kind of the Archivist sits across from Sonmi and he says “What if no one believes your truths?” You sit here and you go “Well, what if nobody goes to see your movie?” Well we tend to say “Well someone already will.” Therefore the movie had an effect on you and in some ways in which…
Post source internet….
Breaking Dawn Part 2: Kristen Stewart Saved By 'The Twilight Effect'?
Breaking Dawn Part two: Kristen Stewart Saved By 'The Twilight Effect'?
Kristen Stewart seems to own had her reputation saved by what will henceforth be called ‘The Twilight Effect.’ Not long ago, K-Stew was thought-about the scourge of the movie world. It was discovered that she had cheated on fellow Twilight star Robert Pattinson, with her Snow White and therefore the Huntsman director, Rupert Sanders and as a result, she was just about spent time to dry by the world’s media, not to say Pattinson’s considerable fan base.
Recently, though, it has looked like the couple have been reconciling their variations and even the staunchest of Pattinson’s fans seem to possess resigned themselves to the fact that frankly, it’s higher for everyone if they’re back along, otherwise that Twilight spell will be broken. Therefore now, we tend to have Kristen Stewart, smiling sweetly at fans during a Breaking Dawn Part Two photocall in Tokyo, Japan, trying like butter wouldn’t soften. It seems that The Twilight Effect will cure all ills… even the biggest Hollywood relationship scandal in recent memory.
According to E! News, Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson are promoting the movie separately. Kristen is additionally scheduled to appear n Live! With Kelly and Michael on November 7 and that they’ll have a whole host of daytime and late night chat show appearances booked too. The movie opens on November sixteen, thus Kristen had higher hope that ‘The Twilight Effect’ lasts that long, as a result of right now, she appears to be back in favour – not simply with R-Patz, but with the globe’s Twilight fans, too.
Post source internet….
The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2' will include ‘the greatest vampire sex you’ve ever had,’ promises Robert Pattinson
|
Robert Pattinson teased that the movie, opening Nov. 16, will feature “the greatest vampire sex you’ve ever had,” during an interview on Australia’s “The Kyle & Jackie O Show” this week.
Though, the sequence featuring his on- and off-screen love Kristen Stewart didn’t exactly feel very sexy to film.
“The sex scene in this one is pretty ridiculous," he told the Australian co-hosts. "It's just because you're kind of shooting stuff to be PG-13, and so it's just trying to think of inventive ways to try to make something sexy.
"It also can't just be a normal sex scene," he adds. "It's supposed to be about, like, the greatest vampire sex you've ever had. So a lot of it was just closeups on me and Kristen's faces, but there was no one else there."
“Try and give a face of ecstasy,” were the instructions from director Bill Condon, but it wasn’t all that romantic - Stewart and Pattinson filmed their orgasmic facial expressions separately.
“We were just sitting there by ourselves, there wasn’t even anyone else in the scene and the camera man was laughing as well,” the 26-year-old British actor said.
Pattinson
also opened up on how he teared up while watching “Marley & Me” and his
love of the decidedly unmasculine non-fat Starbucks Mistos.Not surprisingly,
there was no mention of Stewart’s cheating scandal with her married “Snow White
& The Huntsman” director, Rupert Sanders, which briefly caused Patti son to
split with his girlfriend in the summer.
Natalie Portman flaunts tight post-baby body on set of director Terrence
Malick’s film
Natalie Portman flashed her washboard abs this week on the the Austin, Texas, set of Terrence Malick’s new movie.
After spending some time away from the business after the June 2011 birth of her son, Aleph — her first — with husband Benjamin Millepied.
The 31-year-old Academy Award winner, however, has been busy over the last few months, padding her resume with Malick’s “Knight of Cups,” already wrapped, and the sequel to 2011’s “Thor,” currently filming.
PHOTO: NATALIE PORTMAN THROUGH THE YEARS
For Malick’s latest, Portman sported a pink, belly-baring top and a short jeans-skirt Tuesday.
Including the title, just about every other facet of the “Untitled Terrence Malick Project” is shrouded in secrecy. The drama about the Texas city’s music scene is centered on two “intersecting love triangles,” according to IMDb.com.
The film, which also stars Christian Bale and Cate Blanchett, is due to hit theaters next year.
Post source internet….
Kim Kardashian's Not a Fan of Underwear, Shows Off
Crack
Brett Kaffee / Thibault Monnier,
PacificCoastNews.com
Last
week, Kourtney Kardashian was seen twirling in a flowing skirt sans panties,
showing off her bum for all the paparrazi to see. But it seems big sister Kim
Kardashian wouldn't be outdone by her sister's faux pas, as KK was spotted
today wearing a black top (let's call it a glorified bra) and here's the
kicker: a see-through Lanvin pencil skirt without anything underneath to cover
up that million-dollar tuchis.
Grabbing
dinner with boyfriend Kanye West in Miami, Kim was seen checking out her curves
in the car's reflection, but did she not notice her bum was visible for all to
see? Coming from a reality TV star who tweets self
portraits in barely-there bikinis, we'd say it's all part of a
bigger plan for Kardashian crack domination.
Post source internet….
Jennifer Aniston at Home
“I want to say this just right,” she muses. “I am so proud of this house. And I want to celebrate the people who made it: the master craftsmen who poured so much of themselves into its creation.” Not the least of these is designer Stephen Shadley, who worked with her on the project for nearly two and a half years. “I’ll be lucky if I ever do anything with this kind of team and freedom again,” raves the designer. “It was a project without a problem.”
The designer has collaborated with Diane Keaton on two of her residences in Southern California (AD, November 2008 and April 2005) and one in Arizona (AD, April 1998) and with Woody Allen on the interiors of his apartment in New York City (AD, November 2008). He and Aniston had come close to working together on two other residences.
“I’d heard about this place, and when I saw it, I loved it. I knew it was my métier,” he explains. The house, which was designed by architect Harold W. Levitt in 1970, was under renovation at the time and was, Shadley recalls, “in rough shape. We essentially tore the house apart and rebuilt it.”
Rough shape or not, from the moment Aniston saw the house, she knew it was hers, though it took the woman who owned it seven months to agree to sell it. “I never doubted the house would be mine one day,” the actress remembers.
Why was she so sure it was right for her? She says it was the front doors: big, proud, dramatic 14-foot-tall doors. “I can’t tell you specifically the feeling I had when I walked through the doors for the first time, except to say I knew I was home.”
The house, which Aniston calls Ohana, a reference to the Hawaiian idea of extended family, is the first time she has undertaken the creation of a large residence on her own. The result is an open, airy home that, she says, “has been inside me for a long time.”
Working with the building team of Terry Goebel and Scott Werker, Aniston and Shadley created a slightly Asian, even Balinese, feel for the single-level house, which seems to perch directly on a view of Los Angeles.
“She told me at the outset she wanted a quiet, Zen-like retreat that also had a sense of drama for entertaining,” says Shadley. Indeed, the house has a decidedly tropical feel. The doors Aniston fell in love with now open from a travertine bridge that spans a koi pond. Hanging in the hall just inside is a spectacular Murano glass chandelier, one of the first pieces purchased for the property.
The team rebuilt the house’s massive sliding glass panels, including a 20-foot-long section on the lanai. “Part of the fun of the place,” says Shadley, “is not knowing precisely where the walls end.” To better withstand the weather, the floor of the lanai is constructed of the same travertine found at the entrance. It’s enough stone, quips Shadley, to create “our own little Getty.”
Post source internet….
MTV Music Video Awards: Exclusive clip from ‘The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2’ is action-packed
Fans of the romantic fantasy franchise were treated wtih a new 84-second trailer that debuted at Thursday night’s MTV Video Music Awards show.
RELATED: RIHANNA SHOCKS VMAS WITH SHORT HAIR
PHOTOS: THE VIEW FROM THE RED CARPET
“We want to thank all our fans,” said star Robert Pattinson, who joined Taylor Lautner and other co-stars on stage.
“I’ve had a bad habit of underestimating you,” says Edward Cullen as viewers are treated to a scene of a leaping Bella taking down a mountain lion. “Every obstacle, I’d think you couldn’t overcome it and you just did.”
RELATED: K-STEW EMERGES FOR PREMIERE
It isn't all doe-eyes and kisses for the Cullens, though, as the Volturi, the vampire coven led by Michael Sheen's Aro, vow to wipe out our heroes because they have birthed precocious Renesmee (Mackenzie Foy).
Judging by the previously unseen footage that’s woven into the new trailer, “Breaking Dawn — Part 2” looks to be an action-packed finale to the franchise based on Stephanie Meyer’s book.
Pattinson even gets an “Avengers”-like moment, leaping into the air and landing on the ice in an Iron Man like crouch.
“I thought we’d be safe forever, but forever isn’t as long as I’d hoped,” says a solemn Bella.
ESacks@nydailynews.com
Post source internet….
Courtney Love’s story could grab a Broadway spotlight, says manager Sam Lutfi in suit against Britney Spears
Music industry manager Sam Lutfi — who apparently has a knack for troubled pop stars — was testifying against his former client Britney Spears Wednesday when plans for the Hole singer’s Broadway debut slipped out.
“[Courtney Love and I] are currently working on a possible motion picture or Broadway musical based on the Nirvana catalogue, based on her life and Kurt Cobain’s,” Lutfi testified in the L.A. court where he’s suing Spears and her parents for libel and breach of contract, along with millions in unpaid management fees.
Lutfi, who claims he was hired by the “X Factor” judge as her manager in 2007 and 2008, said that he “currently co-manage[s] Ms. Love … She’s an accomplished actress.”
Love, of course, is the 48-year-old widow of the late Nirvana singer who killed himself in 1994.
Despite his testimony, after court Lutfi tried to backpedal about the plan.
A spokesman for Love, who has 15 acting credits to her name on the IMDB website, including “The People Vs. Larry Flynt,” had no comment on any of Lutfi’s statements, but a source close to the bleached-blond “Hole” singer confirms Lutfi is indeed her co-manager.
“She’s been talking about doing a movie or play about her life with Kurt [Cobain] for a long time,” says the insider, who adds that, “So far, nothing has materialized from it.”
“It’s an idea,” Lutfi told the News’ Nancy Dillon in the courthouse after testifying, when asked what stage the potential motion picture or play is in. “I’m sorry. I can’t say anything more.”
The source close to Love says “it’s been her dream to get her side of the story out” but that she’s “never made any serious actions to do it.”
In 2006 she did take some serious actions to pad her bank account, however, by reportedly selling a significant share of the rights to Nirvana’s publishing catalogue (which Cobain had left to her and their daughter, Frances Bean) to Larry Mestel of Primary Wave Music Publishing. Love reportedly also sold the exclusive rights to distribute Nirvana’s entire catalogue to Primary Wave.
Post source internet….
The A-list turned out for fashion collaborators H&M and luxury fashion label Maison Martin Margiela, who helped bid a fitting farewell to a nine-story 1883 architectural masterpiece known by its address: 5 Beekman St.
Rocking a camel overcoat from the hosts’ collection, Kanye West arrived solo at the high-rise soiree, which was sprinkled with art and performance pieces choreographed by Anne Teresa De Keersmaeker.
“He’s in his element,” said one West acquaintance, adding, “It’s not something Kim would understand.”
West spent the night chatting up Sarah Jessica Parker, Renzo Rosso and Andre Balazs, who was spied flirting with two scantily clad models. One partygoer said that when Chace Crawford met West, “he looked nervous and was a little star -struck.”
Meanwhile, Julianne Moore was overheard telling husband Bart Freundlich, “This is spectacular — I’ve never seen anything like this.”
Last night was lights out for the 5 Beekman site, which is to become a five-star Thompson hotel. “They held [off] construction so we could have this party,” an insider said.
Le Baron nightclub told LiLo to just go — away.
Trouble magnet Lindsay Lohan was turned away from Andre Saraiva’s Chinatown hotspot Wednesday, where Bullett magazine was throwing a party for singer Cat Power. Our source says the rejection forced Lohan’s entourage — which included a “handsome mystery man” who wasn’t her rumored boyfriend Josh Chunn — to calm down the angry “Herbie Fully Loaded” star so they could still make a somewhat dignified exit.
Post source internet….
KIM K JOINS THE WIG PARTY
Kim Kardashian tapped Michael Silva to make a 100% human hair wig for the top-secret costume she’ll wear to the Midori Green Halloween party at Avenue. “It’s just going to enhance her beauty,” Silva hints about the wig, which will take at least 10 hours to make. He cryptically adds, “It’s not meant to have her be unrecognizable,” but, he suggests, Kardashian’s Halloween character will be “the opposite of her.” We’re guessing it’s Einstein.
TRUCK OR TREAT FOR CORCORAN
Real estate giant Barbara Corcoran was seduced into sinking $55K into an L.A.-based food truck on ABC’s “Shark Tank” reality competition show. “I fell in love with the two handsome hunks who own the business,” Corcoran said of her investment. “It was like I haven’t fallen in love since I was 18.” Bill Higgins, her hubby of more than two decades, remarked, “What about me? We met when you were 30!”
TIKI GETS A BIG GAIN
Former Giants running back Tiki Barber and his young wife, Traci Lynn Johnson, rolled into Bounce Sporting Club’s Men Love Pink Too fund-raiser Tuesday and bet “Bounce money” on roulette while huddling with Giants star Jason Pierre-Paul. Barber, whose mother and grandmother are breast cancer survivors, helped raise nearly $35,000 for the Susan G. Komen for the Cure foundation, thanks in part to one bidder who paid $2,100 for a karaoke night with the Giants’ all-time leading rusher.
A dark-haired Scar-Jo walked the streets of Glasgow while filming “Under the Skin” with “Sexy Beast” director Jonathan Glazer Tuesday. Johansson, who split with ex-boyfriend Nate Naylor a couple of weeks ago, was soon seen in New York nightclubs trying to go incognito with nerdy glasses, quirky concert tees and the occasional ponytail. In her new film, she plays an extraterrestrial secretly living among humans.
Did someone order a Hallmark card? Leggy model Hana Nitsche likes Russell Simmons for his sense of charity. “He’s a very good person,” Nitsche told Confidenti@l at the Night of New York Class Gala at Edison Ballroom. “He’s trying to help, even like, animals, and he’s so engaged into it.” Simmons says he and his newest model girlfriend spend their free time doing yoga and going to the beach.
DOUBLE VISION ON FRANCO & BENSON
Hip-hop curiosities the ATL Twins insist their “Spring Breakers” co-stars James Franco and Ashley Benson aren’t an item. “Nah, they ain’t dating,” twin Sidney Sewell told Confidenti@l at Le Baron. His identical twin, Thurman, added: “He might of [had sex with] her once or twice, but they aren’t dating.” The twins also bragged that they are giving skateboarding lessons to Justin Bieber, who is dating their co-star Selena Gomez. “He’s all right,” they agreed almost simultaneously, adding, “He tries.”
JUSTIN’S TRY-ON
New York Giants cornerback Justin Tryon is just trying on some new clothes. Eredi Pisano enlisted the footballer for its ad campaign, dressing him in suits instead of pads. “It’s something I fell in love with,” Tryon told Confidenti@l at an in-store celebration with fellow Giants.
SEEN ..
Natalie Portman Dior mascara ad banned in UK for exaggerating lash-extending effects
Dior
A Christian Dior mascara ad featuring the actress Natalie Portman has been banned in the UK.Christian Dior received a lashing from UK’s Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) for exaggerating the effects if its mascara.
The ad for the the brand’s DiorShow New Look, which featured spokesmodel and actress Natalie Portman showing off long ,dark eyelashes, has been banned in the United Kingdom for misleading customers.
PHOTOS: NATALIE PORTMAN SHOWS BLONDE AMBITION IN TEXAS
Beauty foe L’Oreal complained to the ASA, according to the ruling on the regulator's website.
Dior has denied that they enhanced Portman’s lashes -- sort of.
While they denied using false eyelashes to fluff her flutterers, they admitted to retouching the lashes in Photoshop to "separate/increase the length and curve of a number of her lashes and to replace/fill a number of missing or damaged lashes, for a more stylised, uniform and tidy effect.”
According to Dior, that’s just standard procedure.
The ASA wasn’t buying it.
"We considered that the ad's claims 'Lash-multiplying effect volume and care mascara', '... an unrivalled lash creator effect' and 'delivers spectacular volume-multiplying effect, lash by lash', particularly in conjunction with the image of Natalie Portman's eye lashes, would be understood to mean that the mascara could lengthen the lashes, as well as separate them, increase their thickness and volume, and generally enhance lash appearance,” a spokesperson said, regarding the ruling.
Dior had not received any complaints from customers regarding the ad.
A clothing company called Drop Dead came under fire for showing a model who appeared "underweight and looked anorexic.”
Melanie Thierry’s dizzying turn in an ad for the YSL fragrance Opium was banned because it appeared to simulate druge use.
Nothing says a successful night on
“Dancing With the Stars: All-Stars” quite like Gilles Marini on the dance
floor, clad in nothing but a pair of very tight, very short boxer briefs.
So Tuesday was a good night.
Gilles, Kirstie Alley, Kelly Monaco
and Emmitt Smith took the stage for their group freestyle dance, to infectious
South Korean hit “Gangnam Style.”
And though the result was dubbed a
“hot mess” by judge Carrie Ann Inaba, it was clear from the goofy grins on the
judges’ faces that it was the most fun they’d had in a while.
“It wasn’t timed at all, it wasn’t
together, but it was fun,” head judge Len Goodman allowed.
“Gilles, give me that towel! I’m
wetting myself,” third judge Bruno Tonioli purred, and Gilles acquiesced,
doffing his barely there towel and tossing it toward the judges table.
Sadly, however, the group’s very fun
routine still failed to pull in as high a score as Monday night’s group
freestyle to “Call Me Maybe,” with just 27 out of 30, as compared to Team Call
Me Maybe’s 29.5 out of 30.
Still, the evening ultimately
balanced itself out, with the four cheerleader-and-jock costumed contestants
from Monday night’s group dance performing their individual routines in the
second half of this week’s two-part performance.
While Sabrina Bryan managed to waltz away with an impressive 29 out of 30, the other three celebrities - Melissa Rycroft, Apolo Ohno and Shawn Johnson - only received 27 out of 30 for their good-but-not-great efforts.
Shawn in particular, who performed a
graceful rumba to Celine Dion’s “My Heart Will Go On,” received mixed reviews
from the judges.
Carrie Ann, who typically raved
about the Olympic gymnasts’ natural dancing abilities, dinged Shawn and partner
Derek Hough for performing a lift (which Bruno argued was a catch), and Len
said he felt let down.
“I had great expectations, but
instead by the end I got a bleak house,” the head judge bemoaned.
On the other hand, for Apolo, Len
found a great dancer whereas Carrie Ann seemed disappointed.
“Something’s not quite right,” she
commented. “Maybe you two need to work on your chemistry.”
Or maybe, if Carrie Ann’s reaction
to Gilles was any indication, someone just needs to wear a little less
clothing, eh?
Post source internet…
0 comments:
Post a Comment